Bloggers for Europe
12Sep/096

91% of economists think a Yes vote would benefit the economy

Posted at 6:39 pm by Owen Rooney

Indecon, an economic consultancy firm, has just released the results of a survey of 66 non-governmental Irish economists on their attitudes to the Lisbon Treaty. You can find the report here. The headline stat is that 91% of economists surveyed said that "Ireland’s overall economic interests would be best secured by a 'Yes' vote", which is excellent news for Yes campaigners as they try to convince the populace that voting Yes will help drag Ireland out of the economic doldrums. Other interesting stats are that 65% of economists think that a Yes vote would help bring in FDI (compared to only 3% who said a No vote would do the same) and 75% think that a Yes vote would "significantly enhance Ireland's reputation" (with just 1.5% claiming it would damage our reputation).

Share this post:
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
Comments (6) Trackbacks (0)
  1. This is a survey of 66 people, including an undisclosed number of economists employed by the surveyor itself !

    At the time of the famous 46 letter (on NAMA), it was estimated that there were 200-plus economists in academia. I know at least one who was not approached for this survey.

    Which leaves the credibility of this thing …

  2. I wonder how many of the Indecon staff members who participated in this survey were also among those whose wrote the report.

    I also wonder if it is fair to regard Indecon as “independent” for this purpose.

  3. the 200 in academia were not contacted about the NAMA petition either! Brian Lucey said on radio he contacted 108 in total.

  4. And another thing:

    It would appear that Indecon selected the 66 to “survey”, using rather loaded questions in some instances. (Despite this, the answers to some questions subverted the overall theme).

    I imagine that many assumed, as I did, that a professional outfit like Indecon, before coming out with a document like this, would have circulated, say, all academic economists working in the Republic of Ireland with a scientifically designed questionnaire.

  5. As a result of information in a private communication from Alan Gray, Managing Partner of Indecon, and partially confirmed elsewhere, I withdraw the sobriquet “hand-picked” (used on my website). However, I still have some unexpressed reservations about the methodology employed, on which I would be prepared to expand. Unfortunately, to do so properly would require me to break a confidence.


Leave a comment


No trackbacks yet.

Our Twitter Feed

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

  • Fergus O'Rourke: Dream on
  • Michael Dorgan: Guarantees arent worth a damn thing, there was no guarantees on my polling card and the |Council...
  • Michael Dorgan: Why is article 52 so ambiguous?? Why do we have to wait for case laws to be brought before the ECJ....
  • Ralf Grahn: Impressive, but now you have a lone warrior in Prague Castle, who wants to rob you of the result.
  • Ralf Grahn: The swing to Yes was massive and the majority massive. Thank you, Bloggers for Europe, for your part in...

Tags

Abortion Anthony Coughlan Balkans Charter Charter of Fundamental Rights Citizens Initiative Coir Competences Declan Ganley ECHR ECJ Economists Economy EU European Council European Parliament European Union Exports Federal Foreign Affairs Government Guarantees Human Rights Ireland Joe Higgins Laval Libertas Lisbon Lisbon Treaty Mary Lou Multilateral National Platform New deal PANA Polar bears President QMV Referendum Seamus Heaney Simplified Revision Procedure Sinn Fein Subsidiarity The Da Vinci Code Treaty Workers' Rights

Blogroll

Meta